Hence the concept of softroaders ( CRV is best example ). XUV is a huge improvement over Scorpio/Xylo/Safari even Fortuner when it comes to on road manners. Scorpio is more suitable for offroading than XUV.
![monocoque car body design principles monocoque car body design principles](https://ebrary.net/htm/img/39/1916/126.png)
This should solve all confusion for prospective buyers. Either its real offroad deal or a good on road car which can handle some slush or occasional drive to farmhouse. So Body on Frame construction will hold much better than monocoque.Ī few things must be very clear for buyer when he is purchasing the car. A lot of rough use and overload is being done in remote regions where having even a repair shop is rare.
MONOCOQUE CAR BODY DESIGN PRINCIPLES SERIES
LC series is very popular for rough use in Africa, Middle East and in deserts. This is one reason why Toyota has till date not shifted into monocoque SUV for LC series. A Body on Frame construction will have easier time getting repaired and reaching back to civilization as compared to monocoque SUV. Not all repair shops will have proper welding facilities which are required in case of damage to a monocoque construction. The Body on Frame construction has a very distinct advantage here as they wont require relatively expensive process of laser welding. When offroading, damage might be done to either body or chassis or both. One point which is not mentioned in this thread is that the Body on Frame construction is easier to repair.
MONOCOQUE CAR BODY DESIGN PRINCIPLES DRIVER
However, the driver height is a matter of engineering and doesn't depend completely on the body type. In fact, on a ladder frame vehicle, the driver sits higher. Again, this depends on the vehicles being compared. Also, smaller engines can easily be more complex to repair than larger engines because they have more parts crammed in a smaller space.ĥ. The components are designed for loads and stresses that they will need to bear keeping in mind their application.Ĥ. this is what i could get from net and other sources. I do not know whether the above mentioned points are correct or not. => Braking would be weak because of vehicle is big and not aerodynamic. => Does monocoque chasis will be able to hold tight in case of an accident? (read low weight.) => Expensive spares as it is considered as an SUV. When coming to negatives & doubts, I feel the following (Please correct if required) => Better visibility at night as the driver would be sitting a bit above. => More space inside cabin and in bonnet so more DIY could be done. => The body is light, so the engine would be small so should be easy for repairs and other tasks.
![monocoque car body design principles monocoque car body design principles](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/monocoquechassismanuaurollnu24-180723064128/95/monocoque-chassis-6-638.jpg)
=> The body is light, so the engine required would be smaller so more FE. (Might not be completely true if the quality of spares is not good.) => Lighter body implies better life of tires, suspension and other wear and tear parts. => Monocoque SUV's are basically SUV's and they are lighter, so this makes them more easy to control in some exceptional situations. I see some advantages in monocoque SUV's, however not sure whether i am correct or not. There are enough examples of 200,000 km Swifts, Logans, Citys etc. You really need a body on frame only if you are a commercial operator / offroader / similar application. I personally think monocoque SUVs make the most sense for urban folk from India. They say that monocoque SUVs are safer because of more effective crumple zones (though there are always exceptions to the rule). They also have superior ride comfort and road dynamics. Monocoque SUVs are significantly lighter and thus, all other things being equal, offer better performance & fuel efficiency. Just ask Mahindra and its innumerable UVs based on the same platform. You could stretch / chop a body on frame UV far easier than a monocoque. Offroaders generally prefer body on frames. Body on frame UVs are also more "overload" friendly. They are more robust and can handle abuse & rough roads better. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Monocoque SUVs?īroadly, body on frame UVs are easier to design & cheaper to build (monocoques cost big $$$ in R&D). They are more car like, simple, light weight and have more GC, but do they have enough balance in emergency situations? What would be the advantages and disadvantages of these vehicles? Monocoque SUVs are new to the Indian market.
![monocoque car body design principles monocoque car body design principles](https://editorial.pxcrush.net/carsales/general/editorial/16c43_28.jpg)
Their heavy weight contributes towards their stability (If driven responsibly). They run like a Truck and are more balanced on straight roads. They weigh heavier, which makes them difficult to turn in emergency maneuvers. Yes the frame is built, and then the body is placed on the frame. The old/traditional SUVs are on body on ladder frames. Many aspirants/prospective buyers are discussing about Ford Ecosport. Rest of the manufacturers are trying to develop such SUVs. Renault Duster, XUV500 had bookings since their launch. Monocoque SUVs are selling like Hot cakes. They have become the Hybrids of hatches.Įvery manufacturer is trying to develop one such car. Many are moving towards simpler SUVs which perform better than existing Hatches and Sedans.